Sorry for the low sound, the film is very old, so the digital version has only this volume level.

All next lessons will be with good sound quality.

So it would be better if you listened to this video through speakers or earphones

of course, relationships is loss of freedom. In my opinion equality not only possible in love relationships, but it must be! Though women usually must follow for husband, because he is head of family. It's sharpest edge between managment and dependence.

I think that there are different types of people and they build their relationship according to their type. First type of people like to override another people and second type prefer being in dependent state. Usually the first are men and the second are women and usually they live together because its comfortable for both of them. And also there is another type of people who are wise and self-sufficient. They don't want to subordinate or be subordinated and there is equalty between them. I think this kind of relationship is the best but you must become independent inside to be independent in relationship. And this is hard...

Love relationship is always a partnership. A couple does everything together and they decide it together. But one of them (I think it should me a man) has to be stronger and realize that he takes a responsibility in this business. Obedience is a rejection of own opinions and follow the instructions in all. I think after all woman will think that all what she has done were wrong because her husband said it to her or he's not satisfied with everything. Help in every way possible and everything will be ok.

Thank for this episode.

I read book and watched film and I'm sure that Scarlett didn't afraid to confess her feelings. She just didn't know what is love. She was a young girl in the start of this story who was madly in love with Ashley — a really good boy with perfect behavior. I think she found an ideal for herself in a opposite sex. Because she was a bad girl with nasty morals (despite it I worship her). It is known that opposites gravitate. So when she met Rhett, she found in him herself. Only he known what she want, how, where and when. It was a great passion, but she understood that if she is with Rhett, she will must to obey him even if he will give her everything. Scarlett didn't understand that he really loved her. How did she must to understand it, if Rhett so good hided his feel under the passion. Their relationships so difficult to grasp but so nice to watch

I think that that there are two kind of relationships between man and woman. The first kind is when someone dominates and other one obeys. To the second kind belong couples which build up relationships  like an partnership. They are partners. I wouldn't like to judge what kind is better. I suppose both of them can be sustainable and happy.

Scarlett's the strongest female character I've ever read about. It seems to me that with Rhett they could be partners. I think she would be smart enough to rebuild their relationship.

oh my God! Gone with the Wind! the film for all the time! and Clark Gable is a living personification of the real ma. this movie is really one of the best. because of the screenplay, because of the cast, because of the production scope. this is the story about not love itself but about how to make right choice in life, in love, in war. how to survive through all the circumstances and mistakes and make finally the very right choice.

Scarlett didn´t hide her feelings, she just was acting and playing her role, a role of wilful, caprisious and self-centred lady. May be it wasn't a role, may be it was her nature. Anyway, she knew what was passion, but she wasn't aware of what was a real love, with all its selflessness and self-sacrificingness. These features weren't present in her character until she went through a lot of suffering. 

What concerns dependant and dominant position in relationships, I think some people feel comfort being dependant, some being dominant. And in this case works a known phrase «extremes meet». But there are people who want to be free and tend to share this freedom with someone as free as they are. So here both just unite and make a couple. But whatever one´s personality is, a successful and long'lasting relationship is first of all a partnership and friendship, and all the rest comes after.

Gone with the wind-it's a real masterpiece of cinematography. This story about the eternal struggle of feelings, the fight for a place under the sun. Scarlet prime example that only strongest will survive. And of course the unforgettable love story.

I think, nowadays love relationships between two loving hearts must be equality, although sometimes you want to feel dependent on anyone but only cared and nurtured.

Scarlet was so young when when she got married first times, so she always demanded attention to herself.

Because of her pride, she didn't saw a real feeling — love!!!

Thank God that А. Ripley has made the continuation of Gone With the Wind, and we saw an adult, feminine, and all the same frivolous Scarlett O'Hara.

Love is a very complex concept. They say the most successful case in which the oppositesfall in love. And I think this movie is a shining example of what love each other very similarpeople. and it becomes insuperable barrier in their relationship, unfortunately. Both he and she is beautiful, independent, proud, self-sufficient person. And despite the great passion between them, their love is doomed to pain and suffering.

Hello!

I'm so sorry, I couldn't ask you yesterday

I think, that ususlly one partner dominates in pair. I would say, it's traditional kind of relationships. Most people prefer  these relationships in own families. And percent of devorces is not very high in this occasion.

But there is other kind, when both partners are very strong and self-confident. There aren't many such pairs in our society. People in these pairs must support each other. Or mustn't prevent  to other partner. If people do  these conditions, they will stay together for long time. Such people are ususlly very successful in work, imbodied in all sides of life. But there are a lot of divorces among these people.

I know that it is the most favourite film for my wife. But i don't watch this movie in whole.

It is famous film. This part of movie is funny. I like trolling by Rhett Butler

It the film is similar to other film «The Taming of the Scoundrel» But I know — it is seriously film about life in war.

well... can't say that this is one of my favorite film. looked a very long time, and if you honestly do not eager to reconsider . as English lesson very instructive, as always)

Very famous film, and also very famous book with same title, but I guess they're too boring 

Relationships conduce to loss of freedom, but freedom isn't so good thing. In relations you sacrifise some ease, but get new possibilities. Love is wonderful thing and worth some discomforths.

Of course, equality possible in relationships, but often equalities unnecessary.

Certanly,every family and love relationship should have based with love and respect to each other.But equality is not very good,I think.Family must have a leader of course a man, husband which dominate s and he should takes responsible for his family.The wife ought to obey her husband to many questions but in that time helping him take a right solution in hard case and respects his opinion.The wife is an assistant and inspirer her husband.Then their love will be as long as they want.

love relationships of different people differ and there isn't some universal formula of hapiness for all. I suppose that   love relationships  is not  the fight for freedom, leadership or equality. Genuine  love relationships is freedom of two!

Thank you, Marat, for giving us the possibility to watch an episode from this great film.

I think equality is possible in love relationships, if partners love and respekt each other.And of course every relationship leads to loss of freedom. But it is not so bad, with loss of freedom you can find something that is more importante.And even if equality exists there are times when someone has to consede. But it does not meen someone is not so strong, maybe he or she is only a little bit wiser.

«Gone with the wind» have my loved film, book and heroine! 

But I think that Skarlett did not be afraid to lose the liberty. This her fool nature! Never to yield All girl are befitted by her. She is from literature! So she have the most bright line of the nature. 

Equality in relations not possible and there is beauty in this. When one will tire, another will support his . When another will enrage, the first will suppress his. A life it is difficult. But this much interesting.

Nobody owed nothing to anybody. I think on this axiom should be built normal human relationships. People are together until they feel well yourself with each other. As soon as it becomes more bad than good — people are starting to think about how to get away.

Although it’s possible to women like when dominant male. I can’t say exactly, because there are different cases. But I can say one thing: no one man can’t survive for a long time the woman who will lead them.

My mum has been telling me to read this book since I was a school girl, but as usual I haven't got enough time. This is her favorite love story. I like this episode and I consider that freedom is  impossible in  relationship between  man and woman

I think that the last one phrase is right. One from the couple always will dominate. In some cases it could be clear, and in other it could be hidden. I know that sometimes wife can be a strong woman in social life and inside the family she is not a leader and on the contrary. I guess that this opinion is about Scarlett. I think that she was with a strong character and she didn't want to do things usual for other wifes. But in the same time she needed in a strong man near her like Rett.

P.S.: Marat, I'm sorry for the late work.

Marat, thank you for such different and interesting videos. And for «Gone with the wind»- a special thanks. This movie, belonging to the masterpieces of the world cinema with wonderful actors Vivien Leigh and Clark Gable, left many years ago a strong imprint in my memory. It is difficult to discuss about equality in relations. Experience shows that the equality is very rare. Someone of the couple always suffers and yields , and the other pushes. And in a pair must always be a compromise, one need to change the role of behavior. Otherwise, the relationship may simply end, because one can get tired of constantly yielding and he/she just cracks up, and the second person develops his own self-centeredness. So the best is to keep the balance, to change roles, and of course to maintain respect for each other. Then relations are preserved for a long time.

AS FOR ME ,THE EQUALITY IN LOVE RELATIONS IS NOT ONLY POSSIBLE BUT IT IS NECESSARY! OF COURSE, WOMEN WOULD LIKE THEIR MEN TO BE DEFENDERS IN ALL FIELDS OF LIFE BUT  IF HE  IS NOT DELICATE ENOUGH AND SHOWS HIS SUPERIORITY, IT WILL FINISH BADLY.

Every relationship has to be based on a partnership. Than it is a good and strong relationship. But people are different, their temperaments and characters are differ. Some may be submissive and even want to be told what to do. Others cannot stand when someone tries to order them.

Someone loves more strongly, and he is ready to concede. But it can't be abused. The one who always concedes, starts to feel insult. The partner loses love to him, because it is impossible to love weakness.

They can avoid conflicts, if they will develop the agreement. For example, they have to make decisions by turns. And they will not argue with the partner if he makes the decision.

Oh, I love the atmosphere of this film! Especially costumes! About dependence on the person: this is the agreeable dependence. Most often two strong people turn out in the hard dependence from each other. And they both don't understand, how it's possible? But now they can't live differently. And it doesn't matter, who has more power & influence. Because person, who loves, is doing everything for his half from his soul and heart!

Good day.

I believe that there are several kinds of relationships. Some of this partnership, mutual understanding, some small concessions. Other pairs are satisfied, there is one of the people dominates and the other subordinate, believing in the rightness of judgments of the first. What is the relationship better, but what is worse, I do not know. And I think nobody knows. We can only guess and speculate. The main thing to find yourself more comfortable with that.

I think in love relationship all depend from types of person. Weak and indecisive people need someone who will support them. independent and domineering personality or need the same person, or dependent on him. But there are those couples in which democracy) in which each side is weak, sometimes strong — depending on the situation.

To my mind love is always connected with the loss of independence to more or less extent. Only mutual understanding of the partners, their sincere wish not to loose each other, their deep feelings  may save their love. And that is not the problem of discrimination, domination or superiority. In my opinion everything in our society and our relations depends on delicacy and personality of people we associate with.

Dear Marat, special gratitude for showing us the episode from my first (and that's why my favourite) movie I've seen in English. =)  =) 

Equality in relationships is best, ideal relationships. But no one is ideal, so I think someone always has to dominate. And also relationships is loss of freedom. And I'm so young to loose it. So I dont wanna have good, long, love relationships yet ))))

In my opinion love is an inexplicable feeling. It is difficult to say why do you want to depend on this person and why another's help is like infrimgement on your freedom, why does one person's voice sound like music and another's like a horn. I think that equolity in relationships is only a dream. Love relationships mean that you live for your partner. And it's ideal if you partner understands that and lives for you. But in real life one loves and another allows to love.

Dear u-can!

Is love loss of freedom? Lovers are people who are interested in each other. They are mutually preoccupied by their relationships. They want to be always together not because they have lost independence but because it is requirement of the heart. When you are in love you become another person. You become better. Your eyes fill with shine. And this occurs not because you are a slave or a master but because you have got a gift, the highest skill. So I think that love is not a loss. Love is an obtaining of freedom.

Best wishes,

Actually, relationships are always made up of compromises and someone have to dominate and the other one have to obey. But it doesn't meant to lose your freedom, just limiting it to save the relationships. The compromises needed to avoid the quarrel which could be the reason of breaking up.Sometimes you're totally addict to person and then you don't think about your freedom, you know, you just dissolved in your lover. Thus, i think quality is impossible in the relationships.

I do not really know the answer to this question.

Love topic is too complicated. In my opinion, lovers should be open with each other and try to bring something and maybe not even «something» but even more  into there relationship. Then these relationships will be alive and fresh.

I think equality is possible. By equality I mean private space and room for development. 

As to Skarleett, that was the time of strict principles and man's dominance. Probably, her fears about loosing freedom and becoming dependent silent wife without right to vote or say something were objective.

Hi! IMHO man always have to be more impotant in family, then family will strong ang long. And he will appreciat for it to his wife. And she must be a realy femeninity woman, not cry and shout, be kind by nature

In my opinion one of the two always has to dominate and the other one to obey in family. Impossible it will be a woman or man in our time=)

Relationship between women & man is very interesting game. Nobody don't want say about they feelings. It is good if it don't   long time & doesn't cause someone pain. In the end it may  be Happy End & love for a all life. If it is no, can be simple good relations

When I consider relationships or a marriage I am declined more to the traditional approach when main – the man, and he makes the basic decisions. But I also not against partner relationships. I like something an average between these two approaches more soon. As sociologists consider also. It is a basis of successful relationships or marriage.

I think that equality in relationship shouldn't be cos for the recharge the senses should be sport interest — it creats attraction to dominate.

I feel very sorry for Scarlett, I believe they were a nice couple with Red Battler. He was a real man, she was a real woman very feminine. But some people for some reason have issues concerning freedom. I think it's a rare type of relationship — equal relationship. I personally would prefer this type of being a couple, but unfortunately you don't always find an equal partner. That's what makes an equal relatioship a myth to me.

To my opinion, Scarlett   was really afraid to loose her freedom, she wanted to show how serious, proud and independent she was. And as for a second question, I think that real love doesn't have leaders, both partners  have equal rights, because they are two pieces of one whole. And it doesn't mean that  you are dominate if you earn more or physically  stronger, each partner has its own duties which shoud be done honestly , only in this way man and woman will respect each other